Skip to main content
DEAL WATCH: Free $20 at Chewy $49.00

Get $20 eGiftcard on your first Chewy purchase of $49+ with Code: WELCOME | Read Review

BUY NOW
  • Introduction

  • Design & Usability

  • Features

  • Performance

  • Conclusion

  • Science Introduction

  • Low Light Performance

  • Battery Life

  • Saturation

  • Introduction
  • Design & Usability
  • Features
  • Performance
  • Conclusion
  • Science Introduction
  • Low Light Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Saturation

Introduction

To keep those costs low, however, JVC included no internal memory on the VX700, so you need to add in the cost of memory cards to get your total package. The performance of the camcorder, as well as its cheap construction, didn’t leave us with a strong impression, but the WiFi features are actually kinda cool once you get through the arduous setup process.

Design & Usability

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

Cheap construction and slow response time with touch-buttons make for a frustrating handling experience.

The GZ-VX700 has a slim, rectangular design that makes it more portable than your average mid-range HD camcorder. The design is thin enough to carry the VX700 around in your pocket—granted you're not wearing skinny jeans—and you'd have no problem lugging this light device in a purse or handbag. While the portability of the product is great, the durability concerns raised by the camcorder's cheap construction have me worried. The touchscreen interface is slow and unresponsive, the camcorder body is easy to bang up, and the hand strap is barely more than a flimsy slip of rope, roughly as thick as a shoelace.

The touchscreen interface is unresponsive, the camcorder body is easy to bang up, and the hand strap is barely more than a flimsy slip of rope.

I can't stress enough the difficulty working with the VX700's touchscreen. The screen exhibited such a terrible response that I often found myself pressing buttons three or four times before the camcorder responded. Even something like navigating the menu system, a process that should be the very essence of simple, is an absolute chore, thanks to the unresponsive screen and limited processing power. Want to change controls during video recording? Forget it. The camcorder's menu will respond like it's on the verge of crashing.

Here’s the camcorder in a nutshell: if you’re a beginner with no interest in adjusting controls or using special features, you’ll probably be fine with the way the VX700 works. But if you’re more of an explorer who likes to test out special options, then you’re going to have to prepare yourself for a frustrating ride.

{{photo_gallery "Front Photo", "Left Photo", "Left Open Photo", "Back Photo", "Right Photo", "Top Photo", "Bottom Photo", "Lens Photo", "Lens Photo 2", "3D Lens Photo", "Media Photo", "Easy Mode Photo", "Manual Controls Photo", "Zoom Photo", "Zoom Photo 2", "Ease of Use Photo", "Battery Photo", "LCD Photo 1", "LCD Photo 2", "EVF Photo 1", "EVF Photo 2", "Mic Photo", "Mic Photo 2", "Ports Photo 1", "Ports Photo 2", "Ports Photo 3", "Ports Photo 4", "Ports Photo 5", "Ports Photo 6", "Handling Photo 1", "Handling Photo 2", "Handling Photo 3", "Handling Photo 4", "Box Photo"}}

Features

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

Other than the new built-in WiFi features, the VX700 doesn't have much to set it apart from the crowd.

The most elaborate new feature on the JVC Everio GZ-VX700 is undoubtedly the camcorder's built-in WiFi function. The WiFi components can be very difficult to setup, but once that phase is complete, the VX700 can do some very cool stuff. You can even set the camcorder up in your home and directly monitor what the VX700 sees from another location via the web—great for home monitoring, although JVC warns you shouldn't use the GZ-VX700 for security purposes. A simpler feature involves pairing the camcorder with your smartphone, allowing you to use your phone as a remote control and viewfinder. Like I said, these features can be a huge pain to setup, and it does require quite a bit of tech know-how to get everything going, but if you can get past that, you may have some fun.

The most elaborate new feature is undoubtedly the built-in WiFi function.

JVC also included a few other random options on the VX700, but none of them blew us away. The camcorder has the ability to record both HD and SD video, low-quality slow motion mode, and a bunch of still image settings (including a time lapse mode). The camcorder also offers quite a few manual controls, but the terrible user interface makes many of these features a nuisance to work with.

Performance

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

Mediocre motion and sharpness scores, but surprisingly efficient low light performance.

Color accuracy was not the VX700’s strong suit.

Color accuracy was not the VX700’s strong suit, which is a surprise considering its “big brother” model, the JVC GZ-GX1, did rather well in our color tests. Despite the poor color accuracy, the VX700 produced images with plenty of saturation in both bright and low light.

Thanks to the camcorder’s wide lens, the VX700 performed impressively in low light, and putting up better numbers than most of the competition in the $500 price range. In bright light, the camcorder managed some lovely shots in our motion test, but the lack of any additional frame rates really brings the VX700 down. A lot of camcorder users are hoping to mimic the look of film these days, and you can't do that without a good 24p mode—which this camcorder lacks.

Conclusion

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

If you’re looking for a budget camcorder, we recommend staying away from the JVC VX700. There are better options at hand.

What JVC did to expand the capabilities of WiFi on consumer camcorders is great, but the Everio GZ-VX700 has few other redeeming qualities. Poor color accuracy in bright light, middling image sharpness, and terrible handling issues haunt the camcorder to the point that we're not comfortable recommending it—even if it is a good deal cheaper than the competition. The camcorder's solid low light performance was surprising, but even that result is overshadowed by the incredibly frustrating user interface.

The camcorder's solid low light performance was surprising, but even that result is overshadowed by the incredibly frustrating user interface.

If you’re looking for a budget camcorder, there are plenty of other options. Entry-level camcorders like the Panasonic HC-V500M, Canon HF R30, and Sony HDR-CX210 are all better products in the same price range. Even a mid-range model like the HC-V700M from Panasonic can be found for less than $500 if you shop around, and it's a far-superior option to the JVC VX700.

Science Introduction

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

The JVC GZ-VX700 did surprise us with some fairly strong low light scores, but the rest of the camcorder's performance results weren't anything too special. That's not to say it scored terribly on everything else, not at all. In fact, the camcorder earned fairly average numbers on its bright light tests, including sharpness, motion, and color.

These numbers don't matter all that much, though, because the VX700's major weakness stems from its design flaws. Using this camcorder wasn't fun, and a few decent performance scores couldn't get the VX700 over that road block.

Low Light Performance

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

Respectable—but not amazing—low light performance.

I knew the JVC VX700 was equipped with a fast lens (f/1.2), but, in all honesty, I didn't expect the camcorder to do all that well in our low light sensitivity test. JVC simply doesn't have a good track record with these tests. But all that got thrown out the window when the VX700 needed just four lux of light to record a bright image of our test chart (or 13 lux when using a bit of zoom to frame the chart). With its strong performance in this test, the JVC VX700 exceeded our expectations. It also outperformed the competition in its price range, as well as besting its more-expensive sibling model, the JVC GX1, by a significant margin.

Color was the weakest area for the VX700.

In low light, the VX700 averaged 1.36% noise in its video image. This isn’t an elite score, but it's certainly good for a camcorder in this price range. Color was the weakest area for the VX700, as indicated by a color error number of 5.88 in low light and over 6.0 in bright light. On a positive note, however, the VX700 did register a strong sensitivity level in low light (around 90%), meaning its videos still have plenty of vibrancy even when the lighting isn't great.

{{photo_gallery "Science Section 1 Images"}}

Battery Life

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

The enclosed battery compartment means you can't improve record time by purchasing a larger battery pack.

With compact, budget camcorders, there is always the fear of sub-par battery life. The JVC GZ-VX700 experienced this issue, lasting for just 78 minutes of continual recording in our battery life test.

Here's the real kicker, though: it's not possible to increase this battery life by using a larger pack with the camcorder. Nope, the GZ-VX700 has an enclosed battery compartment, which means the battery can only be one size.

{{photo_gallery "Science Section 2 Images"}}

Saturation

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

Saturation levels stayed above 90% at nearly all times, even though color accuracy wasn't very good.

A good color error score is usually anything less than 4.0. JVC's error in our bright light test? 6.58. In low light, things were marginally better at 5.88, but that's still not desirable. Most of the skew came from green and yellow channels, with the camcorder handling blue tones with very close accuracy (especially in bright light).

The VX700 will give you deep, vivid tones.

Here's what we can't understand: the camcorder managed to keep excellent color depth in light of these poor accuracy scores. In low light, the saturation level was 90%, which is fantastic for a camcorder in this class. In bright light, saturation was a near-perfect 95%. If you don't care about having colors that are perfectly-accurate, you can at least take heart the VX700 will give you deep, vivid tones.

{{photo_gallery "Science Section 3 Images"}}

Meet the tester

Jeremy Stamas

Jeremy Stamas

Managing Editor, Video

@nematode9

Jeremy is the video expert of our imaging team and Reviewed.com's head of video production. Originally from Pennsylvania and upstate NY, he graduated from Bard college with a degree in film and electronic media. He has been living and working in New England since 2005.

See all of Jeremy Stamas's reviews

Checking our work.

Our team is here for one purpose: to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and lab technicians obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes.

Shoot us an email

Up next